Speaking of metadata, though, one option I like better with Lightroom is the ability to assign five colors to photos (but where's the keyboard shortcut for purple?). For me, editing and adding metadata such as titles, captions, and tags are much closer operations than the big divide between Lightroom's develop and library modules would suggest, and I don't like switching back and forth between editing and tagging.Īdobe Photoshop Lightroom is used to edit and catalog photos, chiefly the raw images that come from higher-end digital cameras. Its movable panel isn't very obtrusive, and now in 2.0 you can toggle it easily between editing, tagging, and file management modes. Most of the time I only have zero, one, or two showing.īut I think Aperture makes smart design decisions with a few interface options. I like Lightroom's pull-out panels-as many as four-that can be deployed or tucked away as needed. Here's how I see things stacking up-be warned, though, that I've used Lightroom for countless hours but by comparison only dabbled with Aperture 2.0. But now Apple is back in the game with Aperture 2.0, which reproduces some features in Lightroom, boosts performance, and has a price tag $100 less than Lightroom's $300.īoth packages are solid overall, but there are some features I preferred with one or the other.
#Future of aperture software software
For me, having a rich, searchable catalog is definitely worth it, but tread carefully before you commit, because it'll be difficult to extricate yourself.Īpple was first to enter the higher-end photo software market with Aperture in 2005, but the software languished at the same time Adobe Systems released and rapidly updated Photoshop Lightroom over 2007. In essence, that means the software can be a gatekeeper to your data-not the original images, but the editing settings, titles, captions, tags, and organizational structure. Unlike applications such as Photoshop, which can easily be substituted or used in conjunction with other software, Lightroom and Aperture are equipped to extend their tentacles to manage your library of images.
Photographers would be best to think carefully about which software to purchase, and not just because of the necessary investments of time and money. Please vote in the poll here, and share your reasoning in the Talkback section below to enlighten others.
#Future of aperture software windows
But Adobe's Photoshop Lightroom works on Windows and With Aperture 2.0, Apple is back in the game when it comes to editing andĬataloging raw images. Which software is better: Lightroom or Aperture?
0 kommentar(er)
